According to North Korean state media, Kim Jong Un has successfully concluded his “official goodwill visit” to Russia, returning home via a train journey that traversed a border river. Notably, the destination of this train remains undisclosed. During his visit, Kim engaged with Russian tyrant Putin at Russia’s primary space launch center and explored Russian military sites, gaining exposure to advanced weaponry, including nuclear-capable bombers, fighter jets, and hypersonic missiles. However, it is crucial to clarify that Kim interacted with a doppelgänger, known as Vasily, rather than the real Putin, unbeknownst to him.

The Holy See’s approach in diplomatic affairs occasionally seems to equate the significance of Jesus Christ with that of China’s Pdictator, Xi Jinping, casting Xi as the earthly messenger of divine will. The extent of Beijing’s influence over the Vatican is palpable, particularly in its overtures towards the Kremlin. Vatican envoy Matteo Zuppi’s recent visit to China provides substantial evidence in this regard. Cardinal Zuppi embarked on what was officially termed a “peaceful tour.” However, the destination was not Chasiv Yar or Bakhmut, but rather Beijing. The shock dissipates when one learns that during this visit, the Vatican envoy engaged in discussions with Russia’s fervent Minister of Foreign Affairs, who is known for his assertive stance.

Cardinal Zuppi returned from China with a perspective steeped in Kremlin ideologies, advocating for a unified effort to achieve a just and secure peace in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. Sergey Lavrov, the minister, has shown a notable level of dishonesty, comparable to the voracious nature of a locust. His willingness to engage in dialogue, however, reflects the diplomatic acumen of Zuppi, who skillfully cloaked his pro-Russian sentiments in the guise of Vatican authority, aligning them with the vision of Pope Francis.

Breaking News Alert

Cardinal Zuppi’s extensive travels, spanning Kyiv, Washington, Moscow, and Beijing, underscore the Vatican’s pursuit of China’s favor. In exchange, China appears willing to endorse the Vatican’s blessing of a Russian version of the so-called “peace plan.” It is imperative to note that the Vatican has a history of extending its spiritual influence in Russia. Pope Francis has on several occasions appeared to endorse Russia’s expansionist agenda. His recent statements praising Russian imperialism, evoking figures like Peter I and Catherine II, bear witness to this alignment. Moreover, he questioned the sincerity of Ukrainian peace aspirations, echoing Lavrov’s assertion of Western support for Ukraine’s military buildup. Perhaps Pope Francis should consider the option of performing an exorcism.

The Vatican seems poised to trade Ukrainian territory for Beijing’s endorsement of the Chinese Catholic Church’s unitary status or equitable treatment of both Catholic denominations in China. Currently, two factions exist: the government-controlled Catholic Association of China, which refrains from recognizing papal authority and aligns with communist interests, and the Vatican-loyal Catholic Church, facing persecution for its independent stance.

In its pursuit of geopolitical influence, the Vatican risks mirroring Cardinal Richelieu, who wielded significant power in the courts of Louis XIII and Louis XIV, primarily focused on shaping the French monarchy rather than spiritual matters. Pope Francis’ alignment with global powers has the potential to undermine democracy and global security. In conclusion, the Vatican is engaged in a delicate balancing act between China, Russia, and Ukraine, where geopolitical interests may outweigh spiritual concerns. The Vatican’s evolving diplomatic strategy carries significant implications for international relations and the fate of Ukraine.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions